Monday, March 9, 2015

Teachers Need to Learn What They May Have Acquired

Insight #3 from reading Dana Ferris's Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing:

One of my favorite moments in the Ferris book is when she says this:
Being a fairly competent user of the English language does not in and of itself prepare teachers to diagnose and respond to student error and to explain grammatical concepts in English (48).
Her words made me do a happy dance around my office and then made me realize that this sentence applies to me also. Just because I researched lots of grammar constructions in my IEP (Intensive English Program) teaching days doesn’t mean I don’t have work to do now. 

So, basically what Ferris is saying is that if teachers really want to help their multilingual students improve language-wise, they will have to hit the books to learn consciously some of the language knowledge that they acquired unconsciously (see my first blog post where I talk about the difference between acquisition and learning). 

It is Important for Writing Teachers and Tutors (and even Students) to Understand Some Key Principles of Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

Insight #2 from reading Dana Ferris's Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing:

During my doctoral program, I remember reading a book that was titled something along the lines of Academic Writing as a Second Language. I just spent a few minutes on Google (trying to get the exact title and author) and wasn’t able to track it down, so I might have the title wrong.  However, one of the main arguments of this text was that writing, particularly academic writing, was no one’s first language.  This idea is one that has stuck with me for quite some time and I use this concept when I talk with my students (in any level writing class), and I also use it in presentations to students about college writing.  As I often think, no one expects to become fluent in Spanish after a few weeks of Spanish 1 or even a few semesters.  Yet, someone students are expected to be fluent in academic writing after just a class or two.  I guess what I’m saying is the idea of language acquisition, especially second language acquisition, is a rich metaphor to use when thinking of literacy learning of any kind.

Linguistic Accuracy is Important but It’s Only One of Many Things Multilingual Writers Need to Learn

Insight #1 from reading Dana Ferris's Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing:

Dana Ferris argues:
While we should not neglect attention to student accuracy and clarity in writing, we also should not give it MORE attention than it deserves.  Accuracy concerns should at all times be carefully balanced with development of students’ ideas and rhetorical strategies as well as consideration of the (in) effectiveness of their own writing processes (47).
This isn’t news to me but it helps to have Dana Ferris, an L2 writing scholar, emphasize the balance that writing teachers need to strike with multilingual writers between helping their students improve their knowledge of English but also their ability to negotiate rhetorical aspects of writing—not to mention the actual writing process.  

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Dana Ferris is God or, at least, Extremely Helpful


Because L2* students, in addition to being developing writers, are still in the process of acquiring the L2 lexicon and morphological and syntactic systems, they need distinct and additional intervention from their writing teachers to make up these deficits and develop strategies for finding, correcting, and avoiding errors (Ferris 4).
Error correction should not be seen as the means to eradicate all student errors but as the means to encourage gradual but consistent improvement in accuracy over time, acquisition and application of linguistic knowledge, and development of effective self-editing strategies (Ferris 74).


Only when instructors consider the needs, knowledge, and prior experience of students; make careful decisions about the goals and mechanics of error correction; and embed error feedback in a larger context of developing knowledge and building strategies that will improve student writing will such feedback have the desired effects on our students (Ferris 76).


*L2 = stands for second language versus L1 or first language

I’m reading a number of books by Dana Ferris at the moment and I’m finding her both very thoughtful and practical in terms of her approach to L2 writing in general and to error feedback specifically.  The above quotes are some of my favorites from Dana Ferris’s 2002 book, Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing.  This book is an extremely accessible text aimed at teachers of multilingual writers—both those who work with them in L2 writing classrooms and those who work with them in more mixed settings.  Though her focus is teachers, I’m interested in thinking about how some of her insights might shape tutor development in the writing center.


Overview:

Ferris begins this book by talking about how for many years grammar instruction/error correction was the “dirty little secret” in L2 writing classrooms because teachers struggled to balance key L1 process approach principles with L2 writers linguistic accuracy issues—the end result being that accuracy issues were often not given much emphasis by teachers or teachers felt vaguely guilty when they spent class time dealing with them.  Ferris claims that her own classroom-based “need to understand what might help university ESL writers improve the linguistic accuracy of their texts” (xii) shaped her research agenda over the last 20 years and what she’s learned from this research underlies a lot of her practical suggestions in the book.

         
Ferris sets four (4) goals for teachers who read this text.  She hopes they gain a better understanding of how to:

  1. Adequately prepare themselves to respond to grammar errors and provide instruction;
  2. Accurately assess students’ needs for error correction and grammar instruction;
  3. Provide written feedback on student papers that not only helps students to “fix” problems in current texts but will lead to long-term improvement in accuracy and writing style;
  4. Teach mini-lessons that help writers grasp key terms and rules needed for writing and to develop effective strategies for editing their own work both out of class and under time pressure (2).
Ferris works toward these goals by first, exploring why error treatment is important for L2 writers and how L2 writers issues may differ from L1 writers.  She gives some background about the grammar instruction/error correction debate in second language writing but concludes that this book is based around the assumption that “most teachers—and certainly their students!—nonetheless believe in the potential for error correction, grammar instruction, and editing-strategy training to have positive effects on student writers’ overall development” (9).

With this assumption in mind, Ferris introduces scholarly perspectives on error correction in L2 writing in Chapter 2 and organizes her discussion around four main research questions that have a number of sub-questions.  For example, while exploring the question of “What are the effects of teacher error correction on student writing?” Ferris discusses research that focuses on everything from adequacy of teacher feedback to what degree student writers use this feedback to the different ways this feedback can be given.
            
In Chapter 3, Ferris discusses the important topic of how L2 writing teachers need to be prepared (or prepare themselves) for helping writers with their linguistic needs.  Ferris outlines four (4) principles that she thinks are key to this process:
  • Principle 1.  Teachers of ESL writing need to study aspects of grammar that are particularly problematic for nonnative speakers of English (41).
  • Principle 2. Teachers need practice in recognizing and identifying errors in student writing (43).
  • Principle 3.  Teachers need practice in developing lessons and teaching grammar points to their ESL writing students (43).
  • Principle 4.  Teachers need to understand the principles of second language acquisition and of composition theory (46).
Ferris discusses each of these principles in depth and provides examples of ways to put these principles into action from the MA-TESOL program she teaches in.

In Chapters 4 and 5, Ferris gets even more practical and discusses specific issues teachers need to consider about what, when, and how to give error feedback as well as other ways teachers can help student writers deal with error, beyond focusing on a specific paper.  For example, Ferris discusses approaches teachers can use to help writers understand the importance of editing, to give students instruction in and experience with self-editing strategies, as well as to provide other classroom opportunities for student writers to develop their knowledge and skills.

Finally, in the Appendices section, Ferris provides examples of materials and worksheets one can use both to help teachers and students develop their linguistic knowledge.

Quick Evaluation:
I think this book is a must-read for any teacher who works with multilingual writers.  Though it doesn’t provide any quick fixes, it provides some solid principles and ideas that I think most writing teachers could benefit from thinking about.  I will talk more about WHY I think this is an important book for you to read in my next post.  Stay tuned.

Sunday, February 1, 2015

Sabbatical Scoop

Purpose:
 The purpose of my sabbatical is to explore new ways of supporting the development of multilingual students as readers and writers at the College of Lake County.  As Faculty Coordinator of the Writing Center and as an English instructor who teaches both in the Developmental English and the ELI (English Language Instruction) programs, I have seen firsthand the complexity of the multilingual student population at the college and the diversity of their linguistic and literacy needs.  These are needs that can rarely be met by the classroom experience alone.  That is one of the reasons that the Writing Center is seeing more and more multilingual student writers every semester—both those enrolled in ELI or ESL courses and those in college-level coursework. 

With this in mind, I plan to research best practices and explore innovations in supporting the literacy and linguistic development needs of multilingual writers across the curriculum outside of the classroom—in the writing center, through additional programming, and/or through materials/resources.

Saturday, January 31, 2015

Learners & Acquisitions - The Current Purpose of this Blog

I struggled for weeks to come up with a snappy name for this blog--a place where I plan to both report and reflect on my sabbatical reading and research over the next four months.  This is what I came up with:  Learners & Acquisitions.

Why this name?  In James Paul Gee's article, "What is Literacy?" he borrows a few concepts from Stephen Krashen and makes a distinction between Learning and Acquisition:
Acquisition is a process of acquiring something subconsciously by exposure to models and a process of trial and error, without a process of formal teaching.  It happens in natural settings which are meaningful and functional in the sense that the acquirer knows that he needs to acquire the thing he is exposed to in order to function and the acquirer in fact wants to so function.
  
Learning is a process that involves conscious knowledge gained through teaching, though not necessarily from someone officially designated a teacher.  This teaching involves explanation and analysis, that is, breaking down the thing to be learned into its analytic parts.  It inherently involves attaining, along with the matter being taught, some degree of meta-knowledge about the matter.

As a teacher of language and literacy and as a Writing Center professional, I think a lot about these two processes and how they interact--for me, my students, and my tutors.  For example, as a native English speaker I acquired most of my knowledge about how English works, but in my training to teach ESL, I had to consciously "learn" the rules so I could develop lesson plans and create clear explanations.  As a person who grew up in a literacy rich home environment--reading constantly and writing for myself a lot--I acquired quite a bit of knowledge about how texts worked.  This knowledge helped me connect to more formal lessons in my middle and high school English classes.  Did this make me smarter than students who struggled in these classes? No, it just showed that I had had more exposure.  Acquisition has everything to do with exposure and exposure is something that is not distributed equally in the U.S. educational system. This inequality is made salient to me every day in my work as a community college teacher.